One thing that always seemed strange to me with existing test management tools such as TestLink was the "Pass/Fail" model. Can a test really just pass or fail? That depends how you structure your tests, but when I want to conduct things like scenario or usability testing and save the results "pass/fail" is inappropriate. A much better scale would be "good/bad/fatal".
That's why Quality Spy now comes with completely customizable result types.
Obviously, the first step is customizing your result types. This can be done for every project:
After you have done that, you can assign schemes as the default for the project or for a certain test suite. For example I can create a test suite for usability tests and assign the appropriate schema:
That's it. After that you can execute the tests as usual:
Keine Kommentare:
Kommentar veröffentlichen